<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professional Studio Monitoring System Calibration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/</link>
	<description>Award Winning OEM Audio Product Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:12:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Sijen</title>
		<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/comment-page-1/#comment-4741</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Sijen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiodesignlabs.com/?p=14#comment-4741</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hello Diego:&lt;/strong&gt;

In most applications the LFE channel is designed to provide 10dB of additional headroom above the main channels, for low frequency effects, etc.  This is accomplished by calibrating the LFE channel (not the bass-managed subwoofer portion of the main channels) so that it has +10dB of in-band gain above the main channels.  

Most surround or bass-management controllers allow you to switch between 0 and +10dB on the LFE channel.  The 0dB option is typically included for compatibility with sources that already have the +10dB boost on the LFE channel (such as with a DVD player, etc). However, if you are mixing or creating content, this is usually not the case, and in most cases it should be set to the +10dB position.

You can see how this works in practice by looking at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.audiodesignlabs.com/signal1.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;signal flow diagram of the Blue Sky BMC (follow this link)&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;em&gt;(notice that the +10dB doesn&#039;t impact the level of the bass-managed subwoofer portion of the main channels)&lt;/em&gt;

I hope this helps to clarify things further.

&lt;em&gt;Cheers!&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;-Pascal&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hello Diego:</strong></p>
<p>In most applications the LFE channel is designed to provide 10dB of additional headroom above the main channels, for low frequency effects, etc.  This is accomplished by calibrating the LFE channel (not the bass-managed subwoofer portion of the main channels) so that it has +10dB of in-band gain above the main channels.  </p>
<p>Most surround or bass-management controllers allow you to switch between 0 and +10dB on the LFE channel.  The 0dB option is typically included for compatibility with sources that already have the +10dB boost on the LFE channel (such as with a DVD player, etc). However, if you are mixing or creating content, this is usually not the case, and in most cases it should be set to the +10dB position.</p>
<p>You can see how this works in practice by looking at the <a href="http://www.audiodesignlabs.com/signal1.jpg" rel="nofollow">signal flow diagram of the Blue Sky BMC (follow this link)</a>.<br />
<em>(notice that the +10dB doesn&#8217;t impact the level of the bass-managed subwoofer portion of the main channels)</em></p>
<p>I hope this helps to clarify things further.</p>
<p><em>Cheers!</em></p>
<p><strong>-Pascal</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego</title>
		<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/comment-page-1/#comment-4740</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiodesignlabs.com/?p=14#comment-4740</guid>
		<description>Ok,sorry i read the article  but i don`t understand  the next thing. For the method describe above the sub is calibrated sending 
the test tone to any main chanell and the bass management  and re-routes by a filter the low frecuencies (the test tone in this case)of the main to the sub. I adjust the level of the sub until my spl meter reads 85 dbc (for this case). So ,why after doing this I will know that automatically the sub will 95 dbc (+10 db) for the same test tone if i put it directly to the LFE  instead of the main chanell? I have control of the 0 to 10 db of gain that I can give only to the LFE chanell or is a fabric design? If  I can , I should  always give 10 db of gain to the LFE chanell?


Thanks again .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok,sorry i read the article  but i don`t understand  the next thing. For the method describe above the sub is calibrated sending<br />
the test tone to any main chanell and the bass management  and re-routes by a filter the low frecuencies (the test tone in this case)of the main to the sub. I adjust the level of the sub until my spl meter reads 85 dbc (for this case). So ,why after doing this I will know that automatically the sub will 95 dbc (+10 db) for the same test tone if i put it directly to the LFE  instead of the main chanell? I have control of the 0 to 10 db of gain that I can give only to the LFE chanell or is a fabric design? If  I can , I should  always give 10 db of gain to the LFE chanell?</p>
<p>Thanks again .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Sijen</title>
		<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/comment-page-1/#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Sijen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiodesignlabs.com/?p=14#comment-4728</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hello Diego:&lt;/strong&gt;

If you want to confirm the LFE channel level is correct, you can route the 40 to 80Hz signal to the LFE channel directly, and it should read 95dBc, when the LFE channel is set to +10.  

Again, it is important not to confuse the LFE channel with bass-management and the subwoofer.  The LFE is part of the mix. Bass-management (like the crossover in a speaker) and the subwoofer are part of the monitoring system.  &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bass-Management should not be used to create a LFE channel.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

For more information follow this &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/07/confusion-lfe-subwoofer-bass-management/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.

I hope this helps to explain it better.

&lt;em&gt;Sincerely&lt;/em&gt;,

&lt;strong&gt;Pascal&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hello Diego:</strong></p>
<p>If you want to confirm the LFE channel level is correct, you can route the 40 to 80Hz signal to the LFE channel directly, and it should read 95dBc, when the LFE channel is set to +10.  </p>
<p>Again, it is important not to confuse the LFE channel with bass-management and the subwoofer.  The LFE is part of the mix. Bass-management (like the crossover in a speaker) and the subwoofer are part of the monitoring system.  <em><strong>Bass-Management should not be used to create a LFE channel.</strong></em></p>
<p>For more information follow this <strong><a href="http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/07/confusion-lfe-subwoofer-bass-management/" rel="nofollow">link</a></strong>.</p>
<p>I hope this helps to explain it better.</p>
<p><em>Sincerely</em>,</p>
<p><strong>Pascal</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego</title>
		<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/comment-page-1/#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiodesignlabs.com/?p=14#comment-4727</guid>
		<description>So , if i calibrate a bass management system putting a 40 to 80 hz only on the left or right channel and measure 85 dbc ( the same as the main chanells ) coming from the subwoofer how should I know that the final sound material from the sub ( the LFE sound material plus the bass sound material comming from the main channel)will be 95 dbc totally ?, because I&#039;m putting the test tone only in the main chanell and the bass management system routes the low frecuencies to the LFE but that`s the only sound material in the LFE channel , i don`t have input in my LFE channel.

thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So , if i calibrate a bass management system putting a 40 to 80 hz only on the left or right channel and measure 85 dbc ( the same as the main chanells ) coming from the subwoofer how should I know that the final sound material from the sub ( the LFE sound material plus the bass sound material comming from the main channel)will be 95 dbc totally ?, because I&#8217;m putting the test tone only in the main chanell and the bass management system routes the low frecuencies to the LFE but that`s the only sound material in the LFE channel , i don`t have input in my LFE channel.</p>
<p>thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Sijen</title>
		<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Sijen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiodesignlabs.com/?p=14#comment-561</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hello Carlos:&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;If you are calibrating a &lt;a href=&quot;http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/07/confusion-lfe-subwoofer-bass-management/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bass-managed system&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;; then when calibrating the bass-managed portion of the subwoofer signal and sending the 40-80Hz pink noise signal to any of the main channels (the center channel for example), you should measure 85dBc.

If you take this same test signal and feed it directly to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/07/confusion-lfe-subwoofer-bass-management/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LFE channel&lt;/a&gt;, then it should measure 95dBc (or +10dB of in-band gain above the main channels).  

&lt;em&gt;Please note: &lt;a href=&quot;http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/category/tech_talk/bluesky_design_philosophy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;In a Blue Sky monitoring system, which is bass-managed&lt;/a&gt;, the LFE channel is typically not calibrated separately.  You calibrate the bass-managed portion of the subwoofer signal and then the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.audiodesignlabs.com/signal1.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bass-management controller&lt;/a&gt; adds the +10dB of in-band gain to just the LFE channel (which is then summed with the bass-managed portion and sent to the subwoofer).&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;If your system is not bass-managed:&lt;/strong&gt; Then feed the 40-80Hz pink noise signal to the LFE channel input and you should measure 95dBc (or +10dB of in-band gain above the main channels).

&lt;strong&gt;It is important not to confuse the LFE channel, bass-management and the subwoofer.&lt;/strong&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/07/confusion-lfe-subwoofer-bass-management/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Follow this link for more information.&lt;/a&gt;

Feel free to e-mail me directly, if you have any additional questions: pascal@audiodesignlabs.com

&lt;em&gt;Cheers&lt;/em&gt;! 

Pascal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hello Carlos:</strong></p>
<p><strong>If you are calibrating a <a href="http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/07/confusion-lfe-subwoofer-bass-management/" rel="nofollow">bass-managed system</a></strong>; then when calibrating the bass-managed portion of the subwoofer signal and sending the 40-80Hz pink noise signal to any of the main channels (the center channel for example), you should measure 85dBc.</p>
<p>If you take this same test signal and feed it directly to the <a href="http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/07/confusion-lfe-subwoofer-bass-management/" rel="nofollow">LFE channel</a>, then it should measure 95dBc (or +10dB of in-band gain above the main channels).  </p>
<p><em>Please note: <a href="http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/category/tech_talk/bluesky_design_philosophy/" rel="nofollow">In a Blue Sky monitoring system, which is bass-managed</a>, the LFE channel is typically not calibrated separately.  You calibrate the bass-managed portion of the subwoofer signal and then the <a href="http://www.audiodesignlabs.com/signal1.jpg" rel="nofollow">bass-management controller</a> adds the +10dB of in-band gain to just the LFE channel (which is then summed with the bass-managed portion and sent to the subwoofer).</em></p>
<p><strong>If your system is not bass-managed:</strong> Then feed the 40-80Hz pink noise signal to the LFE channel input and you should measure 95dBc (or +10dB of in-band gain above the main channels).</p>
<p><strong>It is important not to confuse the LFE channel, bass-management and the subwoofer.</strong>  <a href="http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/07/confusion-lfe-subwoofer-bass-management/" rel="nofollow">Follow this link for more information.</a></p>
<p>Feel free to e-mail me directly, if you have any additional questions: <a href="mailto:pascal@audiodesignlabs.com">pascal@audiodesignlabs.com</a></p>
<p><em>Cheers</em>! </p>
<p>Pascal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiodesignlabs.com/?p=14#comment-560</guid>
		<description>I read the articles and I am still having problems understanding the LFE and subwoofer levels. When do I have to calibrate to 85 and when to 95?
Thank you for all the help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the articles and I am still having problems understanding the LFE and subwoofer levels. When do I have to calibrate to 85 and when to 95?<br />
Thank you for all the help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Sijen</title>
		<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Sijen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiodesignlabs.com/?p=14#comment-542</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A quick note about how ADL calculates the RMS value of the 1kHz test tone: &lt;/strong&gt; 

It appears that the reference level we are using for 0 dBFS is different from the reference level used by the manufacturers of &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;some&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; metering plug-ins by 3 dB. 

We use the definition as specified by the Audio Engineering Society in AES17-1998-r2004, where 0 dBFS RMS is defined as the maximum digital value a 997 Hz sine wave can have in the system. Because the maximum value is defined using a sine wave, a square wave can theoretically have a maximum value of +3dBFS.  

Because some metering plug-ins are defining 0dBFS RMS as the maximum possible amplitude for a square wave, instead of a sine wave, a sine wave will read 3dB lower on the RMS scale, but read correctly on the peak scale. These plug-in manufacturers are using a square wave as a reference because a square wave can cause overshoot in the digital reconstruction filters, when a 1kHz sine wave is used as the maximum digital value, which then causes clipping.

So based on this, we would recommend setting the reference levels, when using metering plug-ins that read a difference in level between peak and RMS levels, at -23dBFS on the RMS scale. 

(from &lt;strong&gt;Rich Walborn&lt;/strong&gt; - posted by &lt;em&gt;Pascal&lt;/em&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A quick note about how ADL calculates the RMS value of the 1kHz test tone: </strong> </p>
<p>It appears that the reference level we are using for 0 dBFS is different from the reference level used by the manufacturers of <em><strong>some</strong></em> metering plug-ins by 3 dB. </p>
<p>We use the definition as specified by the Audio Engineering Society in AES17-1998-r2004, where 0 dBFS RMS is defined as the maximum digital value a 997 Hz sine wave can have in the system. Because the maximum value is defined using a sine wave, a square wave can theoretically have a maximum value of +3dBFS.  </p>
<p>Because some metering plug-ins are defining 0dBFS RMS as the maximum possible amplitude for a square wave, instead of a sine wave, a sine wave will read 3dB lower on the RMS scale, but read correctly on the peak scale. These plug-in manufacturers are using a square wave as a reference because a square wave can cause overshoot in the digital reconstruction filters, when a 1kHz sine wave is used as the maximum digital value, which then causes clipping.</p>
<p>So based on this, we would recommend setting the reference levels, when using metering plug-ins that read a difference in level between peak and RMS levels, at -23dBFS on the RMS scale. </p>
<p>(from <strong>Rich Walborn</strong> &#8211; posted by <em>Pascal</em>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Sijen</title>
		<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Sijen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiodesignlabs.com/?p=14#comment-265</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hello Mr. Charles Dayton:
&lt;/strong&gt;
Thank you for your questions.   

With regard to our calibration level recommendations:  These recommendations come from Dolby and are inline with current industry practices. 

With regard to the calibration levels for the subwoofer: I believe you are confusing the LFE channel with the subwoofer and bass-management. We have an article on our website which addresses this common confusion.  Follow &lt;a href=&quot;http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/07/confusion-lfe-subwoofer-bass-management/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this link for more information.&lt;/a&gt; 

However, just to be clear, below are the levels you should use, depending on what you are calibrating and what type of test signal you are using:

&lt;strong&gt;Bandwidth limited LF test file (40Hz to 80Hz):&lt;/strong&gt;
  Bass-Managed Subwoofer Signal = 85dBc
  LFE Channel @ +10 = 95dBc
&lt;strong&gt;
Full-bandwidth Pink Noise:&lt;/strong&gt;
  Bass-Managed Subwoofer Signal = 79dBc (approx)
  LFE Channel @ +10 = 89dBc (approx)

I hope this helps to answer your questions.  Please let us know if you have any additional questions.

&lt;em&gt;Cheers!&lt;/em&gt;

Pascal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hello Mr. Charles Dayton:<br />
</strong><br />
Thank you for your questions.   </p>
<p>With regard to our calibration level recommendations:  These recommendations come from Dolby and are inline with current industry practices. </p>
<p>With regard to the calibration levels for the subwoofer: I believe you are confusing the LFE channel with the subwoofer and bass-management. We have an article on our website which addresses this common confusion.  Follow <a href="http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/07/confusion-lfe-subwoofer-bass-management/" rel="nofollow">this link for more information.</a> </p>
<p>However, just to be clear, below are the levels you should use, depending on what you are calibrating and what type of test signal you are using:</p>
<p><strong>Bandwidth limited LF test file (40Hz to 80Hz):</strong><br />
  Bass-Managed Subwoofer Signal = 85dBc<br />
  LFE Channel @ +10 = 95dBc<br />
<strong><br />
Full-bandwidth Pink Noise:</strong><br />
  Bass-Managed Subwoofer Signal = 79dBc (approx)<br />
  LFE Channel @ +10 = 89dBc (approx)</p>
<p>I hope this helps to answer your questions.  Please let us know if you have any additional questions.</p>
<p><em>Cheers!</em></p>
<p>Pascal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Dayton</title>
		<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Dayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 06:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiodesignlabs.com/?p=14#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the resource and info. One point. according to Tom Holman, the theatrical SPL level is 85db spl when the  reference tone at the outputs is set to -18dbfs. At  -20dbfs the level should be calibrated at 83dbfs. Do you have a difference of opinion on this? Also, when calibrating level for theatrical mixes, using monitors that are not full bandwidth, with a sub, should the sub have a 10db boost above the monitors. I have bass management that I can engage on my monitor controller, so should the sub be calibrated at the same level as the monitors, and just use the bass management for the 10db boost? Also, because the pink noise that is used to calibrate the sub is band limited, will the 10db boost only read as 4 db higher?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the resource and info. One point. according to Tom Holman, the theatrical SPL level is 85db spl when the  reference tone at the outputs is set to -18dbfs. At  -20dbfs the level should be calibrated at 83dbfs. Do you have a difference of opinion on this? Also, when calibrating level for theatrical mixes, using monitors that are not full bandwidth, with a sub, should the sub have a 10db boost above the monitors. I have bass management that I can engage on my monitor controller, so should the sub be calibrated at the same level as the monitors, and just use the bass management for the 10db boost? Also, because the pink noise that is used to calibrate the sub is band limited, will the 10db boost only read as 4 db higher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Sijen</title>
		<link>http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/2008/05/professional-monitoring-system-calibration/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Sijen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiodesignlabs.com/?p=14#comment-254</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hello Maruthi:&lt;/strong&gt;

I would be very careful using pink noise to EQ your system.  The test signals above are designed to adjust the level of your system, including the relative level of the SUB.

In a small room, such as the typical recording studio, I would initially look at adding room / acoustic treatment, before I would look at adding EQ. Follow &lt;a href=&quot;http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/category/tech_talk/acoustics/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this link for more information.&lt;/a&gt;

If you are interested in adding EQ, then I would look for a time based analyzer, not just a frequency versus level analyzer.  Something such as SMAART.

I hope this helps.

&lt;em&gt;Cheers! &lt;/em&gt;

Pascal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hello Maruthi:</strong></p>
<p>I would be very careful using pink noise to EQ your system.  The test signals above are designed to adjust the level of your system, including the relative level of the SUB.</p>
<p>In a small room, such as the typical recording studio, I would initially look at adding room / acoustic treatment, before I would look at adding EQ. Follow <a href="http://audiodesignlabs.com/wordpress/category/tech_talk/acoustics/" rel="nofollow">this link for more information.</a></p>
<p>If you are interested in adding EQ, then I would look for a time based analyzer, not just a frequency versus level analyzer.  Something such as SMAART.</p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
<p><em>Cheers! </em></p>
<p>Pascal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
