Design Philosophy: Blue Sky Studio Monitors
May 17, 2008
This article was also published in the October 2006 edition of Resolution Magazine. You can download a PDF copy by following this link to the Blue Sky website (143KB Adobe Acrobat PDF).
Intro
About 8 years ago, my business partners at Blue Sky and I had a number of meetings to discuss designing a new series of studio monitors. After much debate, we decided there was little point in building another set of “me too†monitors, in the typical 5â€, 6†and 8†2-way configurations. What we felt was needed was a different approach that overcame some of the limitations of current monitors and provided tangible real world benefits to the recording engineer.
So where did we begin?
When creating the requirements for Blue Sky’s nearfield and mid-field studio monitors, we decided to start at the end of the chain and work backwards to the beginning.
Over the last 25 years audio technology has changed and improved dramatically. 25 years ago, people in their homes were listening to scratchy vinyl records and watching movies on analog cable or VHS, in mono. The speakers they used were what came built into their TV, or at best, stereo 2-way ported bookshelf speakers. In their cars, they had a choice of AM radio, FM radio, cassette tapes, or eight track tapes, which were played through 6 x 9 speakers with whizzer cones. Back then the typical 2 way studio monitor was much better than what the typical consumer had available to them for playback.
However, things have changed greatly since then and today’s consumer now has a dizzying array of choices, such as HDTV, digital cable, satellite TV, DVDs, MP3, video games, etc. All these sources are capable of high bandwidth, wide dynamic range stereo or multi-channel audio. Likewise, speaker technology has also improved with the utilization of stereo and 5.1+ speaker systems, with integrated subwoofers. Similar technology advances have occurred in the car audio world. Drivers now have access to CDs, DVDs, digital satellite and HD radio. And like the home, many autos now have complete, factory installed, stereo and 5.1 bi-amplified speakers systems, also with integrated subwoofers.
Following a parallel course, most studio equipment has improved much over the last two decades. With the introduction of digital audio workstations, hard disk recorders, digital mixers, all of which include high performance 24 bit ADCs and DACs, studios today can essentially record DC to daylight. Unfortunately, studio monitors in many studios have not kept up with this trend and in many cases seem to be stuck an infinite time loop. Like 25 years ago, many professionals are still mixing content for today’s consumer systems, on a set of conventional 2-way ported monitors, which tend to exhibit poor low frequency extension. Looking at this situation, we felt that there had to be a better way.
The ‘typical’ studio monitor, in a typical studio
So next we moved one step up chain, to examine the precise reasons why a typical 2-way nearfield monitor is no longer suited to the task of creating mixes destined for today’s consumer.
Almost all 2–way nearfield monitors are ported, use a 5â€, 6â€, or 8†woofer and have a low frequency cutoff between 38 and 65 Hz. Since ported designs roll off at 24 dB per octave, or greater, these monitors are incapable of reproducing much of anything from 20 Hz up to their lower cutoff frequency. This kind of performance was perfectly acceptable when consumer playback systems had similar performance limitations. However, since many of today’s consumers have full-range speaker systems with subwoofers, the typical 2-way ported design, just doesn’t cut it anymore.
The other problem is what happens when you place these monitors in a typical recording studio. Although major movies have their final mix completed on a large dubbing stage, typically with a volume of 20,000 cubic feet or greater, a lot more material is mixed in studios with an internal volume closer to 3000 cubic feet, especially for music, radio and TV applications. Unfortunately, as the physical dimensions of the studio get smaller, the acoustic conditions change as well. The biggest change occurs at low frequencies, which in a large space is an issue relating to low frequency reverberation time. When you move into a smaller studio, the main acoustic factor at low frequencies is room modes, or standing waves. Room modes occur in all rooms / studios at frequencies where the wavelength of sound is an integer fraction (i.e. 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, etc.) of the distance between two walls, or the distance between the ceiling and floor.
Whenever you place a speaker in a small room or studio, its measured low frequency response will be altered by the boundary effects and room modes that form in the studio. This means that invariably some frequencies are reinforced and some frequencies are canceled, resulting in peaks and dips in the frequency response at the listening position. These frequency variations change depending on the location of the speaker and where the listener is located in the studio relative to the speaker and boundaries of the studio. Because of this, bass reproduction from multiple speakers in a studio can be very inconsistent. To add a further complication, the speaker location that is best for imaging is almost never the best place for bass reproduction. So given little choice, recording engineers choose imaging over low frequency performance.
Granted, the use of broadband absorption, which we consider very important, can reduce the effect of studio / monitor interaction to a degree and absorption can definitely be utilized to improve low frequency performance. But, in a typical small studio, broadband absorption will not a fully address these problems.
So what is the solution?
True full-range monitoring, is the phrase which best describes our goal. Not just full-range monitoring for those willing to spend huge amounts of money on large in-wall monitoring systems, but true full-range monitoring for all applications, from the desktop on up. The technologies we employed to achieve this goal are based on well understood principles of physics, are relatively simple to implement and deliver superior real-world results.
First, to provide real low frequency reproduction, reduce intermodulation distortion and to reduce the influence of the studio on low frequency reproduction, we decided to incorporate a subwoofer as an integral part of the monitoring system. This is in sharp contrast to an optional subwoofer added on to an existing “quasi full range†2- way monitor.
The second improvement was to eliminate ports or passive radiators and go with sealed box designs. There were three reasons for doing so: One, sealed box speakers have superior transient response when compared to ported or passive radiator designs. Two, satellite speakers using the correct sealed box design integrate much better with a subwoofer than typical ported speakers. Third and last, the 12 dB per octave roll off of a sealed box subwoofer provides a better match to the rising low frequency characteristics of small rooms / studios. This ‘room gain phenomenon’, which was documented in an AES paper by Louis D. Fielder of Dolby Labs, shows that smaller sealed rooms, such as the typical music studio, exhibit a 12 dB per octave gain below 30 to 35 Hz. This ‘room gain’ response perfectly matches the sealed box response of our subwoofers, allowing for incredible in-room low frequency extension, down to below 20 Hz. Compare this to a typical ported or passive radiator roll-off of 24 dB per octave, or greater, and you can see why the sealed box response is a much better choice for accurate full-range monitoring in a typical recording studio.
The third improvement was to tie this all together with a technique called bass management or bass redirection. Bass management uses filters to extract low frequency information from two or more main channels and redirects that bass to one or more mono subwoofers. This is the same technique that is used in virtually all consumer home theater systems and many high-end car audio systems. Bass management when used in conjunction with satellite and subwoofer speakers provides a number of advantages. First since the satellite speakers do not have to reproduce low frequencies they can be smaller, which make them easier to place in the environment, and they can be placed for best imaging without worrying about how that would affect their low frequency performance. Second, since bass reproduction is coming from a mono subwoofer, the subwoofer can be placed in the optimum position in the studio so as to offer the best overall low frequency response. Thirdly, because low frequencies from multiple channels are now summed electronically, instead of acoustically in the studio, low frequency phase issues between channels are resolved in the most absolute and accurate way possible – electrically.
The critical final step
Now that we have a monitoring system which has the bass being reproduced by a separate source, we have to find a way to ensure repeatable and accurate setup of the system. We have found that many listeners can actually do this very effectively by ear, when using familiar broadband source material. However, to make this process a little more foolproof and repeatable, we provide a free set of wav test files which allow the end user to quickly adjust the electro-acoustic level of the system. These test files can be downloaded from our website. To use them, you just need an inexpensive SPL meter.
The purpose of calibration is to adjust the relative level of the SUB and SAT, along with the overall electro-acoustic system gain, so that 0 dB VU equals a certain acoustic level at the listening position. Since most recording media is now digital, the reference electrical signal level is typically around –20 dBfs with 20 dB of headroom. The acoustic calibration level may vary, depending on the application and standards being used. For film applications this level is typically 85 dBc, but because music is typically more compressed, a lower level, often around 78 or 79 dBc, may be more appropriate.
Once the calibration procedure is completed, the end user has a system which provides extended bandwidth, seamless summation between SAT and SUB, along with an overall more accurate and repeatable system response. We believe this new methodology, which is based on simple and proven technology, makes for a clearly superior monitoring system. This true full-range monitoring system design allows the engineer to create more compelling full-range mixes that translate exceptionally well to the wide variety of modern consumer playback systems currently available on the market.
click to download (Adobe / PDF)
To find out more about Blue Sky’s complete line of studio monitoring systems, follow these links to Product Reviews and Blue Sky News on the Blue Sky website. To learn more about how ADL designs speaker and studio monitors, please follow this link. If you have any questions, or would like to find out what ADL can do for you, please don’t hesitate to contact us.
This article was also published in the October 2006 edition of Resolution Magazine. You can download a PDF copy by following this link to the Blue Sky website (143KB Adobe Acrobat PDF).
